Electronics recycling comes with many challenges, but informed design decisions can improve product lifespan and recyclability.
Often, electronics have a short lifespan. Rapid innovation cycles lead to device replacement, and therefore, the discarding of obsolete devices. Electronic waste (E-waste) is a fast-growing waste stream that contains heavy metals, flame retardants, and other toxicants. Though there are some options for recycling, E-waste recyclability comes with many challenges that limit further adoption. Mixed plastics, hazardous additives, and separation of metals and polymers in E-waste lead to substantial costs and complexities. In 2022, researchers estimated that the United States recycles less than 20% of its E-waste.
Additionally, designing electronics for repairability is often at direct odds with designing for recyclability. When designing with repair in mind, manual disassembly is vital for electronics. Often, ease of manual disassembly leads to difficulties during mechanical separation during recycling. This trade-off highlights a need for design choices that satisfy both of these constraints.
These fragments electronics, shredded at a recycling facility, contain metal still attached to its plastic housing. Courtesy of Designing Electronics for a Circular Economy: How to balance Repair and Recycling.
Ease of removing critical parts of electronics, especially parts that are known to break easily, results in better repairability. Designing electronics that are easily repairable usually means that it is easy to manually disassemble them, too. Still, that does not necessarily mean it would be easier to recycle. On a large scale, E-waste recycling commonly involves shredding, rather than manual disassembly.
The ease of component break-down during shredding varies due to product design and material choice. Some connections, such as friction fits and turn locks, easily break down during shredding. Connections with “material closures” such as glues or soldering, not so much.
You can also read: Nano Molding: The Future of Metal-Plastic Integration in Electronics.
Some connections are better suited for repair than recycling. Courtesy of Designing Electronics for a Circular Economy: How to balance Repair and Recycling.
To improve recyclability, designers should not just consider material choice, but also current waste processing technologies, such as shredding. Each product comes with its own set of design priorities. For electronics with known short lifecycles, recycling may be a higher priority. For repairable products, emphasizing this repairability in design means extending the product’s lifecycle. By integrating closure technologies that are easier to recycle, designers can help prevent these products from entering landfills.
As electronics recycling infrastructure improves, these design approaches may change. For example, a 2022 study at the University of Massachusetts investigated solvent-based processing for the chemical recycling of E-waste. Advances such as this may reduce barriers for E-waste recycling, supporting the circular economy of plastic.
Circularity delays emissions, but geo-operations target mitigation by redirecting carbon from plastics into long-term geosphere…
The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) met to re-evaluate its 2023 proposal regarding per- and polyfluoroalkyl…
Drawing on sedimentology, researchers have proposed a novel classification scheme for plastic waste of all…
Bold minimalism uses negative space, typography, and color blocks to improve shelf impact and thumbnail…
Polyolefins define modern plastics, but their chemical stability now drives a new search for smarter…
Fire performance of materials used in building and construction applications plays a critical role in…